Comparison

This comparison table helps you understand how oRPC differs from other popular TypeScript RPC and REST solutions.

• ✅ First-class, built-in support
• 🟡 Lacks features, or requires third-party integrations
• 🛑 Not supported or not documented

Feature	oRPC	tRPC	ts-rest
End-to-end Input/Output Typesafe	✅	✅	✅
End-to-end Errors Typesafe	✅	✅	✅
End-to-end File/Blob Typesafe	✅	✅	🛑
End-to-end Streaming Typesafe	✅	✅	🛑
Tanstack Query Integration (React)	✅	✅	🟡
Tanstack Query Integration (Vue)	✅	🛑	🟡
Tanstack Query Integration (Solid)	✅	🛑	🟡
Tanstack Query Integration (Svelte)	✅	🛑	🛑
Vue Pinia Colada Integration	✅	🛑	🛑
With Contract-First Approach	✅	🛑	✅
Without Contract-First Approach	✅	✅	🛑
OpenAPI Support	✅	🟡	🟡
Server Actions Support	✅	✅	🛑
Lazy Router	✅	✅	🛑
Native Types (Date, URL, Set, Maps, ...)	✅	✅	🛑
Streaming response (SSE)	✅	✅	🛑
Standard Schema	✅	✅	🛑
Plugins-able (CORS, ...)	✅	✅	🛑
Dedicated Zod Schemas	✅	N/A	🛑
Use Native Modules on each runtime	✅	✅	🟡
Batch Request	🛑	✅	🛑
WebSockets	🛑	✅	🛑
Nest.js integration	🛑	🟡	✅